※一部利用できない機能があります
| 1.
論文 |
論文
|
Lee, Jae-hyuck ; Son, Yoon-hoon
概要:
Government-led ecotourism has advantages including a clear vision and quick outcome; nevertheless, it has stimulated con
…
flicts between government and residents, owing to environmental degradation, stringent regulations, and operating deficits. Consequently, resident-led ecotourism, based on residents’ opinions, has emerged as an alternative to construct ecotourism sites; however, this has stimulated chaos owing to the presence of numerous stakeholders. It is thus necessary to develop a collaborative management plan between two systems. This study analyses the subjectivities of the stakeholders of Maha Ecotourism Site, Pyeongchang, where the operating rights have been transferred to residents owing to the recent conflict between the government and residents. The findings reveal the issue of facility development in government-led ecotourism and the absence of an actual goal and consequently chaotic management in resident-led ecotourism. Furthermore, both the systems face the issue of consensus with regard to the management of regulation, space, safety, land price, and industrial structure.
続きを見る
|
||||
| 2.
論文 |
論文
|
Po-Wen, Huang
概要:
In Taiwan, government staff, judicial officers and private institution owners should avoid erroneously misapplying the G
…
overnment Procurement Act (GPA) and the Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects (PPP). This study examined the literature and conducted a comparative analysis of the legislation processes related to the Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects and the Government Procurement Act. The differences between these two Acts, as well as the government’s promotion of private participation in infrastructure projects, were explored by investigating the spirit of the laws, open procedures, security measures, private sector participation and measures that promote public interest and prevent fraud. In conclusion, the historical background, legislative purpose, implementation procedures, transparency and confidentiality regulations are found to be fundamentally different between the two Acts. Because of this, executives should avoid erroneously misapplying laws.
続きを見る
|
