※一部利用できない機能があります
| 1.
図書 |
図書
|
Ruth Johnson, Wendy Taylor
|
||||||
| 2.
図書 |
図書
|
Fraser, Diane M. ; Cooper, Margaret E. ; Myles, Margaret F.
|
||||||
| 3.
図書 |
図書
|
Betty R. Sweet
|
||||||
| 4.
図書 |
図書
|
成田伸[ほか]執筆
|
||||||
| 5.
論文 |
論文
|
島田, 啓子 ; 名取, 初美 ; 三村, あかね ; 田淵, 紀子 ; 亀田, 幸枝 ; 関塚, 真美 ; 丸山, 綾香 ; 坂井, 明美
概要:
金沢大学 医学部 保健学科 看護学<br />Because midwife1-y diagnosis categories are not established yet, midwives are using nursing diag
…
nosis and models. It may be use釦l to understand potential needs of midwives to investigate the use of nursing diagnosis and models. The purpose of this st""L1dy was to find out what conceptual models and categories are used by midwives in practice as well as how much motivation they have towards midwifery diagnosis. Informed consent was obtained from 128 midwives, who were asked to fill out a questionnaire which consisted of multiple-choice items. The forms were collected immediately, (effective respondents N=116). As a result, we found that 42.2% of the midwives were utilizing some kinds of nursing conceptual models or categories in their practice. The most frequently used models/ categories were those of NANDA (30.6%), Gordon (20.4%) and Roy (18.4%). In tern1s of the background of the subjects, graduates of 3-year basic nursing programs and junior college midwifery programs made more use of concept1ml models and categories than others; likewise, staff nurses did so more than administrators and midwives in the educational field more than midwives in the clinical practice. Those midwives who were currently making use of such models or categories showed a strong motivation level. About a half of the midwives studied were thus providing care while not making any use of conceptual models or categories, which may be a reflection of differences in their educational backgrounds and the contents of their work. Whether their motivational level toward midwifery diagnosis and the use of diagnostic framework are related to independence and professionalism of midwives.<br />助産師が実践の場でどのような概念モデルや診断類型を参考にしているのか,助産診断への取り組みにどれくらい意欲があるのかについて調査した.調査目的に同意を得た助産師128名に質問紙調査を行い,択一式回答を記入し,即時回収した(有効回答n=116).看護の概念モデルや診断類型を利用していた助産師は,42.2%であった.利用の多かったのは「NANDA」が30.6%,次に「Gordon」が20.4%,「Roy」が18.4%であった.属性のなかで,概念モデルや診断枠組みの利用は,3年課程の看護教育を受け,短大専攻科で助産教育を修了した助産師に,又,職位別では,管理職よりスタッフに,更に臨床よりは教育職の助産師のほうが多く利用していた.また現在,看護モデルや診断類型を利用している助産師のほうが,利用していない助産師より助産診断に強い意欲が見られた<br />原著論文
続きを見る
|
||||||
| 6.
電子ブック |
ＥＢ
|
edited by Soo Downe, Sheena Byrom, Louise Simpson
|
||||||
| 7.
電子ブック |
ＥＢ
|
Denise (Dee) Campbell, Susan M. Carr
|
||||||
| 8.
電子ブック |
ＥＢ
|
edited by Patricia Lindsay, Carmel Bagness, Ian Peate
|
||||||
| 9.
電子ブック |
ＥＢ
|
edited by Eleanor Forrest
|
||||||
| 10.
電子ブック |
ＥＢ
|
edited by Ian Peate, Cathy Hamilton
|
